Lawl so I'm now permanently banned from the Kronos forums for telling Psojed, the Paladin tester that he has his head up his ass:
Seal of Command should never fully resist ever - it can be blocked/dodged/parried but only Partially resisted against higher level mobs due to level resist:
Quote
Poster: Caydiem at 3/15/2005 3:16:09 PM PST
Subject: Re: Seal of Command destroyed. The Seal of Command change will no longer be in the upcoming patch.
http://blue.cardplace.com/cache/wow-realm-test/391.htm
Quote
Poster: motive at 3/15/2005 3:36:38 PM PST
Subject: Re: Seal of Command change After considering the posts in this thread we have decided to back this change out of patch 1.3.0 completely and re-evaluate the math behind this before making any further changes.
http://blue.cardplace.com/cache/wow-paladin/106719.htm
Yet he still claims that he is correct:
"In case of "SoC can never be a full resist", none their proofs specifies that SoC can never be a full resist, every proof only mentions a resist or a partial resist. Argument like "Seal of Command uses melee crit, so it cannot be resisted" is nonsense, since the same thing can be said about Judgement of Command. And the one posted video shows a ret paladin DPSing on golemagg, showing lots of partial resists. This was supported by an article about resistances on wowwiki (which clearly mentions that spells can also be fully resisted), and later by the original articles on Resistances by Blizzard, which also shows that spells have a small % chance to be fully resisted, so those proofs work against their case.
Finally, I did a test sample of SoC full resist vs. a boss level on Kronos, and the amount of fully resisted SoC procs in a 5 minutes sample was as low as 2%, which fits the original blizzard's description of resistance mechanics. Just because one video from retail does not show a full resist on Seal of Command, I won't conclude that a SoC cannot be fully resisted ever."
TLDR - Don't play on Kronos