First of all, you make a wall of text, perhaps this is why you can confuse others. Please work on this.
Wargly13 wrote:Well I felt bad after seeing Killerduki's comment. He was kind to me, sorry for writing like that and yeah, Thank you for that, and JCarrill u didnt even understand what I have told.
I get what you typed, but its very sloppy. If i didn't understand it's becuase you write like this which again is VERY confusing.
Wargly13 wrote:I dont even think that u have ever done UBRS, those adds may resist sleep randomly not like at first, it is like u sleep them than 1 of them can resist at 2.
I think I mentioned in an earlier comment you should always double CC, like Sleep, then resleep to make sure its not resisted, but I guess your still confused. (I mentioned that only newbs would get confused by the way)
Perhaps you have never done UBRS.
Wargly13 wrote: second. So thats why we kite. I have tried to explain how to get aggro back when the hunter is back. This is the main problem with taking Drakk as paladin.
re-read what you typed, you didn't explain that.
Wargly13 wrote: Try to understand, hunter pulls boss, u get one add when the warrior gets other one, urs getting killed first than you have to heal the warrior a bit to build some threat on Drakki otherwise when the hunter is back drakkisath will jump on healers instead of you.
you need to explain better if your talking about the Elite guards being killed first, since if you read my strategy above, I explain the same thing about killing the adds (elite guards) while Drakk is being kited.
And Like I said before, Drakk can reset if you kill the adds before the hunter does a FD from kitting, leaving time for player to mana up, heal up, res the dead (if needed). normally we didn't have to worry about that.
(and yet you think I have never done UBRS, lol)
Wargly13 wrote:You didnt understand anything but still trying to answer like an asshole.
you misunderstand, and you type where other misunderstand you, yet you claim I am the @$$hole. Think about your communication before claiming I am the @$$ here. I get you got defensive when I took your wall of text and answered it via quotes, but that doesn't make me an @$$hole, that's just another assumption based on what you think, not know.
Ask Duki, he knows I can be an @$$hole. lol
Wargly13 wrote:I have told that I was tanking as holy. Doesnt really matter if u use holy shock or not. I dont really get it I am telling you the tactic to kill the boss and u are whining about random things in my post.
Whining is a complaint without a solution. I gave solutions, understand the definition of whining.
The tactics were not based on the OP (original post). you need to pay attention when giving advice. you can skim a post and then proceed to give advice if you don't understand what the question was.
Wargly13 wrote:And I am pretty sure that most of paladins would fail if they dont try such a tactic.
Again another assumption, not a fact.
Wargly13 wrote:Getting first aggro from drakkisath is not about being holy or prot because hunter will be bringing him to room when the healers had already built some aggro on him.
WRONG!
This is what I was trying to explain here, healers shouldn't be anyone DOING ANYTHING when the hunter pull, BECAUSE that cause threat on Drak! once the hunter pull and the adds go after the hunter, CC or tank pulling can begin. Have you seriously not done this fight before? LOL.
If a healer has hots up, or a PW: Shield, they get threat, same thing for warriors (if they Bloodrage first). Only the hunter should have aggro, once the pull has started, the tanks can pull the adds back and the Druid can CC if it is needed. It will not link threat on Drak to anyone since threat will not BE on anyone (except the hunter). The PULL is linked yes, but NOT threat table. If a hunter pulls Drak out of the room the threat is only on him (unless a healer throws heals on him which add the healers to the threat table from Drakk).
Wargly13 wrote: So he will jump on them. I am holy and healing raids that's what I have tried to say.
You need to work on writing differently, I'm not trying to be mean, but a wall of text doesn't help the readers.
PS - I'm the @$$hole yet you claimed it wasn't until a month ago that paladins could answer such questions. I found that offensive so yeah, you don't think that was you being an @$$? think about it.
