Who told me Vanilla PvP is awesome ?

Re: Who told me Vanilla PvP is awesome ?

by riq and snog » Wed May 06, 2015 1:12 pm

DonDeLaVega wrote:yes. this is vanilla. but i liked it. and im nostangic now. so i play it. i also play other more balanced games.

sure, undead rogues are imba vs locks and priests.
and undead shadowpriests have an ideal priest-racial.
sure hunters' autoshot is higher than most spells and skills, lol.
and locks are just ezmode in 1v1....
and shamans are a ton better in battlegrounds than palies.

but i give you a challenge.
warrior druid mage.
those three classes are the only ones that the player matters.
and by that i dont mean your tactics, but your fingers.
since skill sequences in wow are pretty much pre-scripted from vanilla till WoD.


Scratch warrior pls cuz ccd 24 /7...
riq and snog
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: Who told me Vanilla PvP is awesome ?

by rptb1 » Wed May 06, 2015 3:21 pm

It's vanilla. It's not balanced. You roll your class and play it. You have to choose your targets with some care. You have to deal with your disadvantages. It's not a game of duels. Guess what? That's why it's *better* PvP. It's more than just the "in combat" part of the fight. The context matters. The world situation matters. It's world PvP.

There are other games that offer "balanced" fair fights with scoring based on a 50:50 win ratio. Those games are good too, but this is not one.
rptb1
Grunt
Grunt
 

Previous

Return to Player Vs Player