Alternative to 17/34 spec for Mages?

Re: Alternative to 17/34 spec for Mages?

by TheFishyOne » Wed Sep 16, 2015 10:36 am

Dark, when dealing with DoTs, I'm pretty sure Magic Attunement only decreases the total damage done, not damage per tick. Is that not the case? Also, if you take 3/3 Imp Blizz, you can no longer overwrite its short term slow with the much longer one from CoC.

Also, I moved a couple points around in that spec to pick up one rank in AF and EP each. Was under the impression that there was a bug with +spellhit, but the folks on the Mage forum don't seem to think so. This was, I can just pick up 1% from gear and be PvP hit capped @ 60.
User avatar
TheFishyOne
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: Alternative to 17/34 spec for Mages?

by Darkwinjax » Wed Sep 16, 2015 11:52 am

TheFishyOne wrote:Dark, when dealing with DoTs, I'm pretty sure Magic Attunement only decreases the total damage done, not damage per tick. Is that not the case? Also, if you take 3/3 Imp Blizz, you can no longer overwrite its short term slow with the much longer one from CoC.

Also, I moved a couple points around in that spec to pick up one rank in AF and EP each. Was under the impression that there was a bug with +spellhit, but the folks on the Mage forum don't seem to think so. This was, I can just pick up 1% from gear and be PvP hit capped @ 60.


I'm posting this from my experience playing mage in ED, yes dampen magic reduces the damage per tick, atleast on ED, I am not playing a mage on nostalrius and in that case I cannot tell you for sure.

I don't quite get the CoC reference? Like I said, main advantage of imp blizz is that it's undispelable. Also, the slow from imp blizz lasts 1 ~ or something seconds, assuming you are not casting blizzard in melee range (pls don't do dis) you have more than enough time to use CoC without it being overwriten by blizz.

I might be biased towards an elemental build, but that's only because after playing 2.4.3 and using the same 17/0/44 spec for a looong time, elemental always felt like a breeze of fresh air. However I do recommend every mage player to atleast get good at 17/0/34 before attempting other specs, like I said, a good mage won't be the one with most kills in the BG.

After you get into the gear-lvl where you can play elemental and you know how to play your class then go for it 4 sure 8-) .

I was never a big fan of the ignite / barrier build but it is true like Sylvant is saying, that the build is super strong and I remember some good mages in ED that ran it 24/7.
lookin like a school shooter when i walk into these halls
User avatar
Darkwinjax
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: Alternative to 17/34 spec for Mages?

by Proctologist » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:07 pm

Aftershock and Tosicx blew me up a lot of times with that spec, Aftershock was more 50/50, but vs Tosicx I won maybe 20% of the duels
(aftershock played tosicx too when we dueled for my vid)
The gear level was identical however, but Tosicx had imp scorch which Aftershock didn't, ignite was doing 500+ per tick ;D!

Realmplayers.com/CharacterViewer.aspx?realm=NRB&player=Procto
Realmplayers.com/CharacterViewer.aspx?realm=NRB&player=Missbunbun


Let's get one thing straight... I'm not.

Image
Hunter + Priest PvE/PvP PoV.
User avatar
Proctologist
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: Alternative to 17/34 spec for Mages?

by yxy » Fri Sep 18, 2015 12:15 pm

Why do people never take improved fire blast over improved scorch?
Being able to fireblast every 6.5 seconds sounds so good to me
User avatar
yxy
Sergeant
Sergeant
 

Re: Alternative to 17/34 spec for Mages?

by Darkwinjax » Fri Sep 18, 2015 3:29 pm

yxy wrote:Why do people never take improved fire blast over improved scorch?
Being able to fireblast every 6.5 seconds sounds so good to me


the bonus % dmg is good but the real reason is that having a stackable debuff (imp scorch / winters chill) appliable with spells is very very good, it's the reason why killing warlock pet in 2.4.3 and 3.3.5 is viable tactic, fucks up priests dispels etc. If you gonna spec that far into fire there's no reason not to take it.

obviously taking winterschill on pvp spec in vanilla is retarded, so don't do that.
lookin like a school shooter when i walk into these halls
User avatar
Darkwinjax
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: Alternative to 17/34 spec for Mages?

by yxy » Fri Sep 18, 2015 7:56 pm

Can anyone confirm that impact does not work if you have frostbite?
I submitted a bug report here http://report.nostalrius.org/plugins/tracker/?aid=2375
and they marked my report as invalid, claiming that it works fine.
User avatar
yxy
Sergeant
Sergeant
 

Re: Alternative to 17/34 spec for Mages?

by yxy » Fri Sep 18, 2015 9:49 pm

Proctologist wrote:Aftershock and Tosicx blew me up a lot of times with that spec, Aftershock was more 50/50, but vs Tosicx I won maybe 20% of the duels
(aftershock played tosicx too when we dueled for my vid)
The gear level was identical however, but Tosicx had imp scorch which Aftershock didn't, ignite was doing 500+ per tick ;D!


500+ per tick of ignite means a 2500+ crit, that's pretty high even for a pyroblast..
User avatar
yxy
Sergeant
Sergeant
 

Re: Alternative to 17/34 spec for Mages?

by Jurary » Sat Sep 19, 2015 5:48 am

yxy wrote:
Proctologist wrote:Aftershock and Tosicx blew me up a lot of times with that spec, Aftershock was more 50/50, but vs Tosicx I won maybe 20% of the duels
(aftershock played tosicx too when we dueled for my vid)
The gear level was identical however, but Tosicx had imp scorch which Aftershock didn't, ignite was doing 500+ per tick ;D!


500+ per tick of ignite means a 2500+ crit, that's pretty high even for a pyroblast..


it's probably a scoch crit followed by a scorch/fb shatter crit.
Image
^Credits to Sheep @ ED
User avatar
Jurary
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 

Re: Alternative to 17/34 spec for Mages?

by Proctologist » Sat Sep 19, 2015 1:24 pm

yxy wrote:
Proctologist wrote:Aftershock and Tosicx blew me up a lot of times with that spec, Aftershock was more 50/50, but vs Tosicx I won maybe 20% of the duels
(aftershock played tosicx too when we dueled for my vid)
The gear level was identical however, but Tosicx had imp scorch which Aftershock didn't, ignite was doing 500+ per tick ;D!


500+ per tick of ignite means a 2500+ crit, that's pretty high even for a pyroblast..


http://realmplayers.com/CharacterViewer ... yer=Tosicx (we dueled pre-AQ)
Here's his gear, dueled him for pvp vid although Aftershock played Tosicx for the vid cuz real Tosicx was scared :twisted: (u can utube his name for his pvp vid on ED)
500 ignite ticks, 5/5 imp scorch.
no pyroblast.

Realmplayers.com/CharacterViewer.aspx?realm=NRB&player=Procto
Realmplayers.com/CharacterViewer.aspx?realm=NRB&player=Missbunbun


Let's get one thing straight... I'm not.

Image
Hunter + Priest PvE/PvP PoV.
User avatar
Proctologist
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: Alternative to 17/34 spec for Mages?

by yxy » Sat Sep 19, 2015 3:40 pm

I'd like to watch the video but I don't seem to find it, do you have a link?
User avatar
yxy
Sergeant
Sergeant
 

PreviousNext

Return to Player Vs Player