This is unacceptable.

Re: This is unacceptable.

by snawfu » Mon Jan 04, 2016 4:32 am

lmao@ horde having op racials ))

fukn shitkidZ
patato
snawfu
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: This is unacceptable.

by stimz » Mon Jan 04, 2016 6:15 am

snawfu wrote:lmao@ horde having op racials ))

fukn shitkidZ


horde has Thunderbluff with a mailbox, anvil, bank and AH next to each other, that's the most OP racial of them all.
stimz
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: This is unacceptable.

by Fubbzy » Mon Jan 04, 2016 7:47 am

stimz wrote:
horde has Thunderbluff with a mailbox, anvil, bank and AH next to each other, that's the most OP racial of them all.


Why doesnt this forum have a like button
Fubbzy
Sergeant
Sergeant
 

Re: This is unacceptable.

by Colezz » Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:15 am

Lol 3 minute queues, I get concerned, drop, and requeue if it goes over a minute
Colezz
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: This is unacceptable.

by billys1337 » Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:46 am

wiseoldenemy wrote:or just quit this laggy ass shit server


lol awesome, less garbage on the server.. cya
User avatar
billys1337
Grunt
Grunt
 

Re: This is unacceptable.

by mozibake » Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:39 am

Additional grass areas have been added to the enemy faction's zones. This grass is exceptionally green.
you think it be like it is but it's don't
-jack brack
User avatar
mozibake
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: This is unacceptable.

by t3hpwn3r3r » Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:17 pm

wiseoldenemy wrote:So, a week or two ago there was a thread about alliance complaining that horde backdoor strategy was too good. Guess what literally during that thread Nost staff gave in to the crying and put up a bunch of mines at the backdoor. Ok, whatever, if it makes the BG more even im ok with it.

HAHAHAHHAHAHA.

This weekend my win/loss is: 3-26.

Yes read that, 3 wins 26 losses.

It's completely unwinnable, alliance never had those numbers, they always won at least a few. This is completely unacceptable, I wasted hours of my life for literally nothing. I was at the beginning of revered on friday, expecting to hit exalted today... Not even close. I played ALL DAY. I feel like im going nuts. I either demand compensation of this utter bullshit or at least fuckn fix the thing so next weekend I don't rip my eyes out.

So, nost staff... IF you don't comply with my crying right now, its clear that your alliance favoured, maybe even PLAY ALLIANCE YOURSELF!?!?!?

sorry, I'm really going nuts today, but really fucking fix this shit what the actual fuck.

3-26...


Image
User avatar
t3hpwn3r3r
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: This is unacceptable.

by Niko » Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:40 pm

i think possibly
gnome racial is the strongest pvp racial after wotf

tbh
Last edited by Pottu on Fri Oct 30, 2015 5:31 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Reason: Put some trousers on
User avatar
Niko
Legionnaire
Legionnaire
 

Re: This is unacceptable.

by Darkwinjax » Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:49 pm

Niko wrote:i think possibly
gnome racial is the strongest pvp racial after wotf

tbh


firstlee, hi bosu

message for u:

even warstomp is better than escape artist tbh)

finnale heres totorial : orc = wotf > warstomp = perception = stoneskin > escape artist
lookin like a school shooter when i walk into these halls
User avatar
Darkwinjax
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: This is unacceptable.

by Glas » Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:52 pm

@wiseoldenemy

You are completely stupid. Nothing will be done with complains only awareness but its not favoring. Its bugs that makes u think nost is favoring Alliance, because you lack awareness of all the bugs, because you dont bother checking the bugtracker, and im completely sure you wont spend your time finding evidence for bugs, if you even consider checking whats bugged, which i doubt.

Every time AV is bonus weekend people complain with lack of awarenss of bugs and just blame others. This is going nowhere, you can ask why confirmed stuff is not fixed and spread awarenss of how much influence some bugs have on AV... Its sad...
User avatar
Glas
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

PreviousNext

Return to Player Vs Player