superfluke use bug

Re: superfluke use bug

by superfluke » Sat Jan 09, 2016 2:58 am

Ana wrote:How ironic that the name of the picture the chinaman hopelessly failed to upload starts with "QQ".


I'm sure someone would say that this is racist, you racist scum. Making fun of him for posting a filename instead of a url. Racist.
superfluke
Tester
 

Re: superfluke use bug

by Schattenlied » Sat Jan 09, 2016 7:02 am

http://i.imgur.com/ISOjNmb.png

I believe this is what he meant to show.

He eventually jumped down behind the wall behind the capture zone, out of LoS of everyone, completely unable to be attacked, and ran through said wall to cap the flag when the horde flag was returned.

This is exploiting, clear as day, and exploiting is clearly not allowed per the ToU (this particular exploit was also possible on on retail back in the day, and was punishable, it should not be tolerated here either). Please ban this piece of shit.
Schattenlied
Private
Private
 

Re: superfluke use bug

by superfluke » Sat Jan 09, 2016 7:26 am

Schattenlied wrote:http://i.imgur.com/ISOjNmb.png

I believe this is what he meant to show.

He eventually jumped down behind the wall behind the capture zone, out of LoS of everyone, completely unable to be attacked, and ran through said wall to cap the flag when the horde flag was returned.

This is exploiting, clear as day, and exploiting is clearly not allowed per the ToU (this particular exploit was also possible on on retail back in the day, and was punishable, it should not be tolerated here either). Please ban this piece of shit.


It wasn't punishable on retail brah
superfluke
Tester
 

Re: superfluke use bug

by Schattenlied » Sat Jan 09, 2016 7:34 am

superfluke wrote:
It wasn't punishable on retail brah


Exploiting was always punishable in retail, and that was considered an exploit. Maybe you just never got caught. You cheated to win that game, you know it, I know it, the 18 other people in that BG know it.

If it was intentional, they wouldn't have fixed it.
Schattenlied
Private
Private
 

Re: superfluke use bug

by superfluke » Sat Jan 09, 2016 7:36 am

Schattenlied wrote:
superfluke wrote:
It wasn't punishable on retail brah


Exploiting was always punishable in retail, and that was considered an exploit. Maybe you just never got caught. You cheated to win that game, you know it, I know it, the 18 other people in that BG know it.

If it was intentional, they wouldn't have fixed it.


It's a walljump dude, they didn't fix it until they revamped physics in 2.4 which made the majority of all walljumps impossible.

I had a twink with over 70k HKs that did this in every game and multiple GMs talked to me about it when ally got salty. It was never a problem.

If walljumps aren't allowed on Nost I'll stop. Until then, QQ more.
superfluke
Tester
 

Re: superfluke use bug

by RandyZie » Sat Jan 09, 2016 7:39 am

Maybe nost will put some mines and some npcs there, maybe some archers? Sounds blizzlike
Priest
User avatar
RandyZie
Grunt
Grunt
 

Re: superfluke use bug

by superfluke » Sat Jan 09, 2016 7:40 am

RandyZie wrote:Maybe nost will put some mines and some npcs there, maybe some archers? Sounds blizzlike

lel pls add more mines, it worked well last time
superfluke
Tester
 

Re: superfluke use bug

by Schattenlied » Sat Jan 09, 2016 7:45 am

superfluke wrote:If walljumps aren't allowed on Nost I'll stop. Until then, QQ more.



It's not about walljumping,l it's about getting outside the intended map and becoming essentially invincible. It's pathetic behavior from a pathetic player who can't win without bug abuse.
Schattenlied
Private
Private
 

Re: superfluke use bug

by superfluke » Sat Jan 09, 2016 7:47 am

Schattenlied wrote:
superfluke wrote:If walljumps aren't allowed on Nost I'll stop. Until then, QQ more.



It's not about walljumping,l it's about getting outside the intended map and becoming essentially invincible. It's pathetic behavior from a pathetic player who can't win without bug abuse.


my feels when you started playing after 2.4 and you don't know how to do the jump and can't figure out the search terms to find a video on how to do it.
superfluke
Tester
 

Re: superfluke use bug

by Schattenlied » Sat Jan 09, 2016 7:49 am

Started playing in 1.6 actually, I just never stooped to that level of pathetic.
Schattenlied
Private
Private
 

PreviousNext

Return to Player Vs Player