WTF with multiqueue and stuff? Blizzlike MY A**

Re: WTF with multiqueue and stuff? Blizzlike MY A**

by Capaszabi » Mon Oct 26, 2015 11:25 pm

diogenes wrote:
packersville wrote:Seems like a compromise would be not to allow for

Should a queue open while you are already in a battleground, you may switch to the new battle or remain in the current on.


So once you join a BG you drop all your other queued battlegrounds.


Honestly, that wouldn't fix the problem nost was aiming for with premades. The problem was that they had a blizzlike queue pairing with multi queue. Then they decided they wanted to try and prevent premades from farming pugs. So what they did was set up a premade priority and left multi queue in. What resulted was utter disaster.

Basically, for about 10 weeks, both ally and horde premades queued up for both AB and WSG. So when ally got a queue pop, ally would take WSG. When horde got a queue pop, they would take AB. Since there were at least two premades who got paired up against each other, that effectively created two games where the side opposite the premades were empty. Therefore, the system would throw in the solo queuers that were waiting for a game against a premade; and since there were often multiple premades per side, the solo queuers were often outnumbered by a ratio of 2-3:5 at the very least.

That sort of compromise you're suggesting would not help with that sort of a system at all. And would only revert to the absolute worst pvp experience that existed on this server.


Indeed. Unless you forbid ones inside the game get the queue up from outside and as soon as you accept a call, you lose all other queues. In this scenario grpA (h) and grpB (a) queues for both ab/wsg. They both receive a call. If they choose the same bg, they meet and they cant dodge. If they choose different, they would face pug/empty/party filled opposing side. Here comes the idea that i suggested, to wait with pop until a double pool fills up. In that case, no matter they choose the same (facing each other) or the "dodge" scenario the instances are filled on both side fully. Farming pugs? Honestly. If a pug vs prem game starts with 15v15, its fine i guess. The pug can abuse/slow prems, and they can get a ton kills by holding 1/2 nodes. Yes, it can be annoying facing prems 24/7, but i experienced it on retail and it has nothing to complain about. Also you have to consider to think about what size of group queueing together count as a "prem".
Capaszabi
Grunt
Grunt
 

Re: WTF with multiqueue and stuff? Blizzlike MY A**

by Mariehu » Tue Oct 27, 2015 7:54 am

Capaszabi wrote: Also you have to consider to think about what size of group queueing together count as a "prem".


This.

No you shouldn't have to consider what size your group is to count as anything at all!!! That's the way it should work!!! I shouldn't have to leave my 6th friend out of the group because otherwise we would only face premades.

This is not blizzlike! I could play with 5 friends back in retail and not always be paired against a premade. Why do they enforce us to make parties bigger than we want to if we want to compete? Or why do they enforce us to make smaller parties to at least have that tiny bit of chance not to be paired against a premade?

Stop fucking with the queue system, put it back to normal as they had on retail where anyone could play whatever the fuck they wanted to!
Mariehu
Sergeant
Sergeant
 

Re: WTF with multiqueue and stuff? Blizzlike MY A**

by Ana » Tue Oct 27, 2015 9:24 am

Capaszabi wrote:Honestly. If a pug vs prem game starts with 15v15, its fine i guess.


It isn't because the pug will always be filled with afk china cunts, making it 15vs10 or worse. At least in pug vs pug you have the odd chance of both sides having similar number of chingchong shitters.
Ana
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: WTF with multiqueue and stuff? Blizzlike MY A**

by vathdaar » Tue Oct 27, 2015 11:19 am

ppl complaining about non blizzlike things asking in the same post for custom prem vs prem qeues. #nostalogic.
<GOD>
Lord of the <Local Ungoro Mafia>
Curator <NOPE>
vathdaar
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: WTF with multiqueue and stuff? Blizzlike MY A**

by zzxx » Tue Oct 27, 2015 11:36 am

Posted this in other thread, I think the new queue system works good.
zzxx wrote:Honestly, i just hit 60 after not queuing in any 60 bgs for like 3 months and all my games have been much better(doesnt mean i win every game), so whatever they did to queue system seems alright.
When i first heard about it i thought it sounded gay but tbh its fine
this is as alliance tho :P
Time and space, it's a crossroad through a gate, where do you go?
Getownedlol
Ogtucker
User avatar
zzxx
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: WTF with multiqueue and stuff? Blizzlike MY A**

by stimz » Tue Oct 27, 2015 11:40 am

Free accounts + people willing to buy ranked accounts will always degrade the quality of PvP. Nothing can be done about it, this patch was around when F2P wasn't even considered a viable business model for MMOs. That said, Blizzlike Vanilla is a stupid thing to hope for, especially when the server opened on 1.12, the patch that was out just a few months before TBC dropped.

No content will be difficult until Naxx, and I'm pretty sure 1.12 is around the patch where lotheb was 5 manned with spriest heals. Either way, enjoy chasing rank.
stimz
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Previous

Return to Player Vs Player