So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

by Crakajax » Sun Sep 20, 2015 4:07 pm

Sham wrote:
Crakajax wrote:Dont waste your time in 29, full of cocky players that roll bad hunters that think they're good. If you want an active bracket roll a 19. Q's are like 5 min and both sides field a good mix of players. again 29 suck the big one and 19 is the master race.


90% of bracket is rogues/hunters and classes have 2 abilities one which is autoattack. Lol, no thanks

and yet its still better then 29 it seems GG
User avatar
Crakajax
Grunt
Grunt
 

Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

by Shmuck » Sun Sep 20, 2015 5:20 pm

Crakajax wrote:
Sham wrote:
Crakajax wrote:Dont waste your time in 29, full of cocky players that roll bad hunters that think they're good. If you want an active bracket roll a 19. Q's are like 5 min and both sides field a good mix of players. again 29 suck the big one and 19 is the master race.


90% of bracket is rogues/hunters and classes have 2 abilities one which is autoattack. Lol, no thanks

and yet its still better then 29 it seems GG


LOL you are listening to the useless horde hunter who complains hunters are overpowered as he rolls one himself. Kid is just sad he is getting beat by more skilled players that is all.
Shmuckumpoo level 39 Gnome Rogue
Mumlock level 29 Gnome Warlock
Dyel level 29 Human Paladin
Guild Master of <Almost Thirty>
Shmuck
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

by Umbre » Sun Sep 20, 2015 5:41 pm

Sham wrote:
Crakajax wrote:Dont waste your time in 29, full of cocky players that roll bad hunters that think they're good. If you want an active bracket roll a 19. Q's are like 5 min and both sides field a good mix of players. again 29 suck the big one and 19 is the master race.


90% of bracket is rogues/hunters and classes have 2 abilities one which is autoattack. Lol, no thanks


Thats a lie the 19 bracket has alot of variety , in a full bg you pretty much have all or most class , yes sometime a bg is packed with shaman,rogue,hunter or priest but thats a minority of game and that situation happen in all bracket.
User avatar
Umbre
Grunt
Grunt
 

Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

by Shmuck » Sun Sep 20, 2015 6:27 pm

Umbre wrote:
Sham wrote:
Crakajax wrote:Dont waste your time in 29, full of cocky players that roll bad hunters that think they're good. If you want an active bracket roll a 19. Q's are like 5 min and both sides field a good mix of players. again 29 suck the big one and 19 is the master race.


90% of bracket is rogues/hunters and classes have 2 abilities one which is autoattack. Lol, no thanks


Thats a lie the 19 bracket has alot of variety , in a full bg you pretty much have all or most class , yes sometime a bg is packed with shaman,rogue,hunter or priest but thats a minority of game and that situation happen in all bracket.


This is what people need to realize. No matter what bracket it will be packed with meta classes. This isn't anything new; people figured out what classes are best and those classes are obviously going to be featured.
Shmuckumpoo level 39 Gnome Rogue
Mumlock level 29 Gnome Warlock
Dyel level 29 Human Paladin
Guild Master of <Almost Thirty>
Shmuck
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

by stimz » Sun Sep 20, 2015 9:02 pm

Well, to be fair, anything that deals physical DPS is gonna be good in all brackets, simply because their damage scaling doesn't come at a major cost of mana and health and can be further buffed with might and bshout, aside from hunters, which obviously benefit from being the only physical ranged DPS class.
stimz
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

by mousepad » Sun Sep 20, 2015 11:13 pm

rogue pocketed by 2-3 mouthbreathing EU priests and carried by an extra 1000ish HP advantage calling me bad. Yeah ok

I rolled one because I knew exactly what I was getting into before I even came into a bracket I know how alliance cocksuckers operate in every bracket retail and these servers
mousepad
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

by Shmuck » Sun Sep 20, 2015 11:51 pm

Anyone who knows me will tell you I don't have "pocket" healers as you call it. I just play the game to the best of my individual potential and it is obviously better than whatever you have to offer so...
Shmuckumpoo level 39 Gnome Rogue
Mumlock level 29 Gnome Warlock
Dyel level 29 Human Paladin
Guild Master of <Almost Thirty>
Shmuck
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

by roland79 » Mon Sep 21, 2015 2:25 am

what is FtoM?
roland79
Sergeant
Sergeant
 

Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

by mouthbreather » Mon Sep 21, 2015 3:39 am

Are 39s active? Which side needs twinks? And what classes?
mouthbreather
Private
Private
 

Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

by Xylon666Darkstar » Mon Sep 21, 2015 6:31 am

There is no FOTM in vanilla retail. Especially since class skills are forever static in 1.12.1 until TBC.
Image
Image
User avatar
Xylon666Darkstar
Knight-Lieutenant
Knight-Lieutenant
 

PreviousNext

Return to Player Vs Player