Regarding Battlegrounds on Nostalrius

Re: Regarding Battlegrounds on Nostalrius

by Darkwinjax » Sat Oct 17, 2015 4:23 am

alliance is fair to premade since most players are handicapped and you get the racials. Horde should only solo queue cause the amount of china / shitter in alliance is like 3:1 ratio compared to horde.
lookin like a school shooter when i walk into these halls
User avatar
Darkwinjax
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: Regarding Battlegrounds on Nostalrius

by diogenes » Sat Oct 17, 2015 8:20 am

Darkwinjax wrote:alliance is fair to premade since most players are handicapped and you get the racials.


So you're pvping as or a human and you're going to complain about horde racials when you had the opportunity to choose really good ones by going gnome... And you really have no excuse because human is absolute shit for locks in both pvp and pve. At least you get some crit from that int in pve...

Horde should only solo queue cause the amount of china / shitter in alliance is like 3:1 ratio compared to horde.


Horde's china to "shitter" ratio exists because horde's rankers are pugging. You are absolutely clueless if you really think the average fresh 60 r3 is any better than the average ally fresh 60 r3.

But since you're a pug, I can't be angry at you. I can only pity you for being unable to see beyond your keyboard when you play.

Jurary wrote:you're complete shit and have no clue what you're spouting mate.


Do you even do anything other than raid? What makes you think you're qualified to judge the state of pvp? Are you even in a premade this WSG weekend? Have you queued ally side as well as horde side? What's your perspective on this; how many people who have lots of experience of the new queue system have you spoken with? If your perspective only that you queue up for bgs once in a while, then its probably not well informed enough to know or even understand what is going on.
diogenes
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: Regarding Battlegrounds on Nostalrius

by Darkwinjax » Sat Oct 17, 2015 11:13 am

kek, gnome really good racial, i'd rather take the 0.5 useless shit for anything other than a warrior vs mage that still won't make a difference in the matchup, over a bugged "25%" stun resist or 5 sec fear / charm immunity!! XD

only reason to roll alliance is because most interested pvp players are on horde side and i'd rather have fast queues, only an inbred would get pissed @ vanilla pvp

I do look forward to seeing you retards who actually think that the racials don't make a difference (specially in pug pvp) roll alliance on a certain tbc server.

Owait anyone that actually wants to play competitive arena and hope for rank 1 will never ever pick alliance in these early installments of the game because horde racials are 10x better for 99% of the situations.

once again i'll call u a retard because canceraids like you can't even into 10 year old game. And btw, this "alliance deserves to prem" shit is pretty accurate, most alliance prems are dogshit because most ppl who rank on alliance are pve heroes, again, i'm sorry u can't understand better racials appeal to pvp oriented players.
lookin like a school shooter when i walk into these halls
User avatar
Darkwinjax
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: Regarding Battlegrounds on Nostalrius

by arOo » Sat Oct 17, 2015 12:20 pm

I would always pick Alliance if I just go for top brackets in TBC arena.
Having a rogue with perception to find the enemy druid is pretty broken- add a few Warglaives and you have a 50% default win against those teams.

And don't be a cunt about the gnome racials, they are pretty good for alot of classes (incl warlocks).
/allyourbasearebelongtous
Nuar - Nostalrius Begins PvP
User avatar
arOo
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: Regarding Battlegrounds on Nostalrius

by Niko » Sat Oct 17, 2015 12:36 pm

arOo wrote:I would always pick Alliance if I just go for top brackets in TBC arena.
Having a rogue with perception to find the enemy druid is pretty broken- add a few Warglaives and you have a 50% default win against those teams.

And don't be a cunt about the gnome racials, they are pretty good for alot of classes (incl warlocks).

Not to mention classes that depend on snares against warriors without getting analrekt, can't really snare gnums and hence getting analrekt. Not stronk at all!

Dwarves eating blinds? Not stronk at all!
Perception getting druids and rogues out? Welp!
Shadowmelding casts and openers, to open with multishots on your terms? Well, well!
Alliance priest racial that heals like 50% health on a few minute cd? Weeell, well, well.

I bet people still cry about windfury being overpowered compared to bubbleboys? :D
Everything in this game is fucking unfair when it's put down under microscope, glad the alliYeAnX don't know how to optimize/play paladins properly on this realm.
Last edited by Pottu on Fri Oct 30, 2015 5:31 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Reason: Put some trousers on
User avatar
Niko
Legionnaire
Legionnaire
 

Re: Regarding Battlegrounds on Nostalrius

by Darkwinjax » Sat Oct 17, 2015 12:48 pm

arOo wrote:I would always pick Alliance if I just go for top brackets in TBC arena.
Having a rogue with perception to find the enemy druid is pretty broken- add a few Warglaives and you have a 50% default win against those teams.

And don't be a cunt about the gnome racials, they are pretty good for alot of classes (incl warlocks).


/sigh

Priest / Rogue is problably most common setup run by rogues in 2.4.3, it's problably the one you will never beat with Rogue / Druid, specially if you are playing ally side.

Only setups where I'll agree human is better on rogue are double DPS comps, lock / rogue i'll agree that running alliance is best. Mage / Rogue is debatable and SP / rogue is handsdown horde for DP.

Also, unless you are PvE heroe you won't have glaives, but I would take a 100% win-ratio vs any rogue / druid by rolling undead anytime.
lookin like a school shooter when i walk into these halls
User avatar
Darkwinjax
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: Regarding Battlegrounds on Nostalrius

by Darkwinjax » Sat Oct 17, 2015 12:53 pm

Niko wrote:
arOo wrote:I would always pick Alliance if I just go for top brackets in TBC arena.
Having a rogue with perception to find the enemy druid is pretty broken- add a few Warglaives and you have a 50% default win against those teams.

And don't be a cunt about the gnome racials, they are pretty good for alot of classes (incl warlocks).

Not to mention classes that depend on snares against warriors without getting analrekt, can't really snare gnums and hence getting analrekt. Not stronk at all!

Dwarves eating blinds? Not stronk at all!
Perception getting druids and rogues out? Welp!
Shadowmelding casts and openers, to open with multishots on your terms? Well, well!
Alliance priest racial that heals like 50% health on a few minute cd? Weeell, well, well.

I bet people still cry about windfury being overpowered compared to bubbleboys? :D
Everything in this game is fucking unfair when it's put down under microscope, glad the alliYeAnX don't know how to optimize/play paladins properly on this realm.


hey blind being poison is not nice.
perception only catches bad rogues and is semi-situational in BGs or even world pvp.
shadowmelding shouldn't work like vanish and absorb casts, that's a bug. If you actually think meld > warstomp lelelel.
Alliance priest racial is good but you guys got the SP part.

Paladins are obviously 10x better than shamans, too bad all paladins on server are fucking handicapped and / or ret specced. Like I said m8, in competitive PvP, racials will make difference! u may not notice it in a 10vs10 environment as much though.

but to think it doesn't impact pug games?hummmmm
lookin like a school shooter when i walk into these halls
User avatar
Darkwinjax
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: Regarding Battlegrounds on Nostalrius

by arOo » Sat Oct 17, 2015 2:06 pm

Niko wrote:glad the alliYeAnX don't know how to optimize/play paladins properly on this realm.

Nah they are just hiding /hi seth&grogamos.
/allyourbasearebelongtous
Nuar - Nostalrius Begins PvP
User avatar
arOo
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: Regarding Battlegrounds on Nostalrius

by Jurary » Sat Oct 17, 2015 2:27 pm

Healthycoww wrote:
Jurary wrote:you're complete shit and have no clue what you're spouting mate.


Have you hit rank 5 yet? :mrgreen:


im rank 6 bro after rekking some forums noobs as enhance in av all weekend last week.
Image
^Credits to Sheep @ ED
User avatar
Jurary
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 

Re: Regarding Battlegrounds on Nostalrius

by Dusch » Sat Oct 17, 2015 9:51 pm

mates let me tell u a truth

wotf here is full of shit since theres only 2 warlocks on ally side playing pvp)


and yea hate it or love it but ally has best racials & paladins for prem vs prem
User avatar
Dusch
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 

PreviousNext

Return to Player Vs Player