20-29 Thread

Re: 20-29 Thread

by Kes » Mon Apr 11, 2016 12:23 am

Shmuck wrote:I'm hitting up playtbc when it starts. You'll know the name come and find me baby


See you there ;)
User avatar
Kes
Grunt
Grunt
 

Re: 20-29 Thread

by comanche » Mon Apr 11, 2016 12:43 am

Kes wrote:
Shmuck wrote:I'm hitting up playtbc when it starts. You'll know the name come and find me baby


See you there ;)


So you guys are not going to twink?
comanche
Private
Private
 

Re: 20-29 Thread

by stimz » Mon Apr 11, 2016 12:58 am


Oh yeah? And where will you get BiS boes if noone levels and sells them? Or who will fill roaster if not enough twinks on?


prot ret with uthers str ravager , jc flat redux item, sanct, facefk instances in 2 to 3 pulls. we never really relied on levelers to fill rosters on either side honestly, its better in fact that everyonw who queues does so with the intention to compete
stimz
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: 20-29 Thread

by Kes » Mon Apr 11, 2016 1:30 am

comanche wrote:
Kes wrote:
Shmuck wrote:I'm hitting up playtbc when it starts. You'll know the name come and find me baby


See you there ;)


So you guys are not going to twink?


What other options are there? I plan just to go test out the server and for the sake of all the hype. Kronos seems like the only other option.
User avatar
Kes
Grunt
Grunt
 

Re: 20-29 Thread

by stimz » Mon Apr 11, 2016 4:12 am

Kes wrote:What other options are there? I plan just to go test out the server and for the sake of all the hype. Kronos seems like the only other option.


29s were at their absolute peak in TBC. Max level content was way better as far as time invested vs skill went as well. I hope that playtbc server doesn't suck.
stimz
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: 20-29 Thread

by Bounga » Mon Apr 11, 2016 9:07 am

comanche wrote:
Bounga wrote:fuck kronos ( no point of going from a good vanilla server to a shit one ) and fuck lorderaon ( wotlk sucks 300%)

i wait playTBC, we will see if its good or not

and to the idiot that stole my name in like x5 different servers ,
that was not needed since i won't play on these garbage servers anyway,
try that again on playtbc when it comes out, and thx for the laugh



There twinks will be dead,as instant 60..


who said i want to twink there ? ^^
Bounga
Tester
 

Re: 20-29 Thread

by Forestembrace » Mon Apr 11, 2016 9:42 am

Sham wrote:
stimz wrote:
Sham wrote:Ya, instant 60 is death sentence to twinking.

i disagree completelu.


Oh yeah? And where will you get BiS boes if noone levels and sells them? Or who will fill roaster if not enough twinks on?


this, gotta have non twinks playing bgs on their own initiative to have a twink community happen imo, just twinks v twinks is only fun occasionally

the factors needed for twink communities as we like them to blossom
-low experience rate
-high/very high population
-decent expansion - vanilla, tbc, not sure if wotlk, wotlk ruined some of it for me with how the bgs were organized, also my favorite 49 class, shaman, got their stat scales messed with, so i got kind of a sour taste @wotlk
User avatar
Forestembrace
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: 20-29 Thread

by Sham » Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:19 pm

There is review of playtbc from tester: https://www.reddit.com/r/wowservers/com ... xperience/
Doesnt look very good.

I gave up on Lordaeron. Server is good for leveling and PvE, but not for twinking. On top of games being rare and never full, this pic from 29s says its all: http://i.imgur.com/LgoAVEc.jpg
Hunter Insanitty (29 twink)
Warrior Insannity (29 twink)
Warlock Inssanity (29 twink)
Priest Darksanity (29 twink)
<Amost Thirty> guild
Sham
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 

Re: 20-29 Thread

by Bounga » Tue Apr 12, 2016 12:50 am

sadly the best choice atm for twinking seems to be... Kronos
Bounga
Tester
 

Re: 20-29 Thread

by Banther » Tue Apr 12, 2016 6:46 am

It seems like the devs are stating that most bugs are dealt with, in the comment section (playTBC)
29 paladin Tiriontyfus (A)
29 warrior Behsten (H)
Banther
Private
Private
 

PreviousNext

Return to Player Vs Player