Suggestion: rename forum subsection

Let's face it:
PvE or PvF (Player vs Flag) is more appropriate.
Solely trying to avoid any kind of PvP action to increase the efficiency of honor farming simply can't be called PvP.
No wonder those who premade all day can't even play their class when they never had any fair PvP fight.
The overall state of "PvP" on Nostalrius is hilarious:
- about 84% of all BGs consist of either an alliance or horde full premade group and a pug group on the other side
- the pug group will most likely leave the battleground as soon as they get an other queue pop resulting in full premade vs a few pugs games
- about 10% of all BGs are "ghost games", premades not entering BGs, 1v9 or similar
- that leaves 6% for actual games if you are solo queuing
in other words: every 17th BG consists of actual PvP action
@Nost staff: If you're aiming on providing an actual vanilla experience, this is the wrong way.
The toxicity of the current "PvP" is far beyond lethal.
You do know what has to be done.
PvE or PvF (Player vs Flag) is more appropriate.
Solely trying to avoid any kind of PvP action to increase the efficiency of honor farming simply can't be called PvP.
No wonder those who premade all day can't even play their class when they never had any fair PvP fight.
The overall state of "PvP" on Nostalrius is hilarious:
- about 84% of all BGs consist of either an alliance or horde full premade group and a pug group on the other side
- the pug group will most likely leave the battleground as soon as they get an other queue pop resulting in full premade vs a few pugs games
- about 10% of all BGs are "ghost games", premades not entering BGs, 1v9 or similar
- that leaves 6% for actual games if you are solo queuing
in other words: every 17th BG consists of actual PvP action
@Nost staff: If you're aiming on providing an actual vanilla experience, this is the wrong way.
The toxicity of the current "PvP" is far beyond lethal.
You do know what has to be done.