Page 1 of 6
So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

Posted:
Fri Sep 18, 2015 11:21 pm
by mousepad
I was told that 29s have insta pops
First, waiting close to 40 minutes(37) for a queue, second it was 1vs7
Da faq?
At least 19s had a sizeable 8vs8 or 10vs10
Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

Posted:
Sat Sep 19, 2015 12:44 am
by Shmuck
First, when did you queue? Second, what faction? Third, did you queue AB because with the changes nobody is queuing AB till AB weekend since WSG rewards are incoming.
Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

Posted:
Sat Sep 19, 2015 2:03 am
by Sham
They broke queues with recent "fix", they definetly became longer. But still nowhere near 40min for WSG. Forget about AB until they return double queues
Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

Posted:
Sat Sep 19, 2015 6:18 am
by mousepad
it was AB
idk
29s feels like junk still so far there is like 20 alliance twinks, and I haven't seen a single horde. Alliance massively stacks fotm hunters and priests...what a joke..all of them are junk but are carried by the class/gear and the massive numbers (5 hunters per game 4 priests,gg)
Kinda reminds me of 20-24 cata/mop pvp and WoD 20-29 retial..alliance pulled the same shit there US and EU. I might stick to 39s where priests are still godlike but at least you can viper sting them..on here...4 keyturning alliance priests clusterfuck of healing that cant be outplayed
Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

Posted:
Sat Sep 19, 2015 6:19 am
by mousepad
and then I tried wpvp
went to STV...until a 60 alliance cocksucker shows up..only way alliance can fight, imho
Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

Posted:
Sat Sep 19, 2015 6:54 am
by goblite
Are there plans to bring multi-que back?
Was there a reason for this change?
If so, i'd appreciate links to the posts where it is discussed.
It really sucks to only be able to que for one bg at a time. I would really like to play an arathi basin match now that i'm in the 20's bracket but... i haven't seen one pop yet. I assume this is because queing for wsg is easier? At least if players can que for both bg's both will pop.
Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

Posted:
Sat Sep 19, 2015 7:54 am
by stimz
mousepad wrote:it was AB
idk
29s feels like junk still so far there is like 20 alliance twinks, and I haven't seen a single horde. Alliance massively stacks fotm hunters and priests...what a joke..all of them are junk but are carried by the class/gear and the massive numbers (5 hunters per game 4 priests,gg)
Kinda reminds me of 20-24 cata/mop pvp and WoD 20-29 retial..alliance pulled the same shit there US and EU. I might stick to 39s where priests are still godlike but at least you can viper sting them..on here...4 keyturning alliance priests clusterfuck of healing that cant be outplayed
When did alliance get all those hunters?
Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

Posted:
Sat Sep 19, 2015 8:58 am
by mousepad
there was 4 dwarf hunters(all 29 and geared)
and some random night elf
and 2 geared priests
next game FOUR priests and like3 hunters.
Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

Posted:
Sat Sep 19, 2015 9:02 am
by stimz
Might not be a coincidence that the same people from your previous game queued into your next game.
Re: So is 29s actually junk and worse than 19

Posted:
Sat Sep 19, 2015 9:38 am
by mousepad
Well
it was a different game the other game they had 2 priests and 5 hunters and then the next FOUR priests and 3 same hunters.
what a junk bracket. Alliance has 3-5 hunters that are twice as geared as me and priests....Basically FoTM galore every single alliance game.
Alliance who think they're hot stuff behind 4 priests (how do you die on a fully twinked priest 1vs1 to an ungeared hunter is beyond me you literally have to be inbred or suck a dick)
http://imgur.com/PkPj2dQhttp://imgur.com/TYBryG0Then again you have to give them some leeway because that's the only way alliance /Russians can pvp