So 163 ms latency is more like 1063 latency...

We are always open to new ideas. Come here if you have a suggestion, we will discuss it together.

So 163 ms latency is more like 1063 latency...

by Theloras » Tue Aug 04, 2015 7:47 pm

Respectfully, I think you guys are being dishonest with the latency bar readings for players here on Nostalrius.

All things being equal, it shouldn't take me close to 30 seconds of running on top of another player before auto-attack actually engages. Same thing goes for Hammer of Justice being applied to my target but I still get Polymorphed, Feared, Gouged...

These kind of conditions were what PvP was like on Peenix - Archangel and made any kind of PvP for melee there completely unplayable.
Theloras
Knight-Lieutenant
Knight-Lieutenant
 

Re: So 163 ms latency is more like 1063 latency...

by Noxm » Tue Aug 04, 2015 11:08 pm

Pottu wrote:
ognennyy wrote:The developers and GMs have been open and communicated honestly about everything up until this point. The ping reported by Nostalrius is the only exception I have noted. At peak time with 7k players online and a ping 4-5 seconds, the game reported ping still shows 150ms. Please stop manipulating this number in order to make the server more appealing to the general population, and be honest with this as you have with all other things.

Thanks!

The ping is correct - it measures the time taken for a packet to travel between your client and the server. The extra delay that happens when the server is under heavy load is just that: server side. Your connection is still the same 150 ms but the server needs an extra hundred milliseconds or two to process the command that you issued.


+ Vanilla server arenot design to gather 7k+ ppl
Nostalrius PvP -
Noxm - <Core Raider of Emphasis>
Alt : Noxmk - Noxmq
User avatar
Noxm
Knight-Lieutenant
Knight-Lieutenant
 

Re: So 163 ms latency is more like 1063 latency...

by zeequenz » Wed Aug 05, 2015 12:21 am

^What Pottu and Noxm said.

Get used to it. Maybe hope than someday the population thins out to a playable level, until then - quit whining.
Inzayne - Level 56 Troll Hunter
How weak must one be to get offended by mere words?
User avatar
zeequenz
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: So 163 ms latency is more like 1063 latency...

by Theloras » Wed Aug 05, 2015 12:25 am

zeequenz wrote:^What Pottu and Noxm said.

Get used to it. Maybe hope than someday the population thins out to a playable level, until then - quit whining.


making a valid comment on the situation of the server = whining?
Theloras
Knight-Lieutenant
Knight-Lieutenant
 

Re: So 163 ms latency is more like 1063 latency...

by zeequenz » Wed Aug 05, 2015 12:26 am

Theloras wrote:
zeequenz wrote:^What Pottu and Noxm said.

Get used to it. Maybe hope than someday the population thins out to a playable level, until then - quit whining.


making a valid comment on the situation of the server = whining?


making the same comment for the 55th time on the situation of the server = whining
Inzayne - Level 56 Troll Hunter
How weak must one be to get offended by mere words?
User avatar
zeequenz
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: So 163 ms latency is more like 1063 latency...

by Theloras » Wed Aug 05, 2015 12:29 am

zeequenz wrote:
Theloras wrote:
zeequenz wrote:^What Pottu and Noxm said.

Get used to it. Maybe hope than someday the population thins out to a playable level, until then - quit whining.


making a valid comment on the situation of the server = whining?


making the same comment for the 55th time on the situation of the server = whining


this is the first time I've ever posted anything about latency on the forums bro
Theloras
Knight-Lieutenant
Knight-Lieutenant
 

Re: So 163 ms latency is more like 1063 latency...

by zeequenz » Wed Aug 05, 2015 12:31 am

Yeah, cause I definitely implied you are the ONLY person on this Server. Or the first one to complain about any delay. Get your stuff together and delete this thread. You're wasting traffic.
Inzayne - Level 56 Troll Hunter
How weak must one be to get offended by mere words?
User avatar
zeequenz
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: So 163 ms latency is more like 1063 latency...

by Theloras » Wed Aug 05, 2015 12:35 am

zeequenz wrote:Yeah, cause I definitely implied you are the ONLY person on this Server. Or the first one to complain about any delay. Get your stuff together and delete this thread. You're wasting traffic.


I guess I missed the memo which stated that you are the guardian of all things Forum Based.

Go FUCK yourself son - you're wasting my time...
Theloras
Knight-Lieutenant
Knight-Lieutenant
 

Re: So 163 ms latency is more like 1063 latency...

by Aslan » Wed Aug 05, 2015 4:11 am

I remember something from way back, in their trailer.. Seperated zones and therefore no lag...?
Scar - Endurance
Aslan - The tales of a Shaman...
Raid streams; As soon as the lag is adjusted (rip)
http://www.twitch.tv/scarnostalrius
User avatar
Aslan
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: So 163 ms latency is more like 1063 latency...

by Talryx » Wed Aug 05, 2015 5:47 am

I know there has been resistance to this idea but I really think a second realm would be a good thing for Nost. 3-4k is perfect; 5-8k is just too many people. Lag, competition for quest mobs and rare spawns, excessive pvp that crosses the fun line and becomes obnoxious, weird effects on the auction house from surges of supply and demand and certain hours when tons of people sign on and off, etc... 3-4k max per realm would be a lot healthier, more fun, and more blizzlike.
User avatar
Talryx
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Next

Return to Suggestions