Vote on /World's Future

[iheartbenben]

As of 3:00 am US CENTRAL on March 15, 2015


1. Yes, GM's should control moderation.
22 votes (39%)

2. Nor, there should be only /say timers (one /world say per 15 seconds)
13 votes (23%)

3. No, Player's should control moderation.
12 votes (21%)

4. Neither, there should be NO moderation.
10 votes (18%)

[Shiggs13]

Just cause other private servers moderate it doesn't mean that this one will. This server isn't like others. Get over it already. It's pathetic how you guys are whining every single day.

[Syff]

I'd say let let it be moderated by GM's

[Taph]

I vote for NO /world

[neozeromus]

the thread is one hour old, let the people vote before you jump to conclusions

[Blackadder]

WHY DO OTHER PRIVATE SERVERS MAKE A WORLD CHANNEL?

Because the population is small, so getting a little extra help communicating with your fellow man is helpful from a game design point of view.


Is the population small on Nos? No it isn't


Hence we don't need the server initiated global channel and the admins did not make one..


Don't like the childish nonsense going on in player made channels? leave them, put the worst kids on ignore and use other means of communicating.

[OGTUCKER117]

As of 2:30 am US CENTRAL on March 15, 2015.

1. Yes, GM's should control moderation.
18 votes (38%)

2. No, Player's should control moderation.
12 votes (25%)

3. Nor, there should be only /say timers (one /world say per 15 seconds)
10 votes (21%)

4. Neither, there should be NO moderation.
8 votes (17%)

GM vote now 47%

[Momoh]

world chat shouldn't exist.

bye

[Sinjack]

World is mostly just spam, trolls, and annoying memes. I've traded and found several groups without it. I'd rather them ban all player made channels other than moderate a crummy world chat

[Shiggs13]

I hope they just ignore troll threads like this. I know if I was a moderator, I would too.