Viper appreciation thread ('tuber controversy')

Discussion forum related to Nostalrius Begins in general.

Re: Viper appreciation thread ('tuber controversy')

by Colezz » Wed Mar 16, 2016 9:06 pm

Off-topic
Last edited by Pottu on Thu Mar 17, 2016 5:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Spam
Colezz
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: Viper appreciation thread ('tuber controversy')

by Ana » Wed Mar 16, 2016 9:15 pm

Wow. I'm impressed.

I reckon it would serve Nost well to avoid the potential for such shit storms in the future, though, no? Just tweak the procedure to be sensible... like, server-wide announcement several times over a span of 2-3 days when you make a decision that X is in fact a bannable exploit, prior to banning anyone for it... seems like common sense tbh.
Ana
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: Viper appreciation thread ('tuber controversy')

by Alyndra » Wed Mar 16, 2016 9:17 pm

i approve of this. i didn't expect it but it's great news.
Image
User avatar
Alyndra
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: Viper appreciation thread ('tuber controversy')

by varth » Wed Mar 16, 2016 9:19 pm

So you unban these NOPE members but no unban for silithus miners? Apparently I just need to create a million threads calling for justice non stop while spewing hate and that will work.

Free Silithus Miners! They literally mined a fully blizzlike node and got perma banned for it, while these guys committing an obvious abuse (granted a blizzlike abuse) get unbanned. What the hell is that?
varth
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 

Re: Viper appreciation thread ('tuber controversy')

by Kurise » Wed Mar 16, 2016 9:20 pm

bockhorm wrote:I think we all ought to show our appreciation to how Viper and Nostalrius handled the 'tuber controversy' in the end. It's very nice to see that they can reconsider and show some serious and well-needed consideration for people who, without a doubt, were wrongly banned.


I agree.

The guys that have a "Last Warning" from repeated abuse of bugs/exploits shouldn't have been banned.
Kurise
Grunt
Grunt
 

Re: Viper appreciation thread ('tuber controversy')

by Noxm » Wed Mar 16, 2016 9:30 pm

Alyndra wrote:i approve of this. i didn't expect it but it's great news.


+1

Ana wrote:Wow. I'm impressed.

I reckon it would serve Nost well to avoid the potential for such shit storms in the future, though, no? Just tweak the procedure to be sensible... like, server-wide announcement several times over a span of 2-3 days when you make a decision that X is in fact a bannable exploit, prior to banning anyone for it... seems like common sense tbh.


Suggestion : Ad bot System to spread Tou
https://forum.nostalrius.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=17815
Nostalrius PvP -
Noxm - <Core Raider of Emphasis>
Alt : Noxmk - Noxmq
User avatar
Noxm
Knight-Lieutenant
Knight-Lieutenant
 

Re: Viper appreciation thread ('tuber controversy')

by Ana » Wed Mar 16, 2016 10:03 pm

ToU is useless POS. It's too vague.
Ana
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: Viper appreciation thread ('tuber controversy')

by Thefilth » Wed Mar 16, 2016 10:47 pm

Off-topic
Last edited by Pottu on Thu Mar 17, 2016 5:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Spam
Thefilth
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 

Re: Viper appreciation thread ('tuber controversy')

by vathdaar » Wed Mar 16, 2016 10:54 pm

i ll refrain from some statements i made last days thinking nostalrius was somehow going into the same rail as other prjects (feenix).

I must say im surprised to finally see viper in action and he played up to what was expected, a fair sanction ( a warning) and not an abusive measure coming from other players who just feed their insignificant existance in trying to ban others.


Thumbs up viper, stay long in this project. +1
<GOD>
Lord of the <Local Ungoro Mafia>
Curator <NOPE>
vathdaar
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: Viper appreciation thread ('tuber controversy')

by milkribs4k » Wed Mar 16, 2016 11:02 pm

So basically you can overturn very understandable bans against people who have numerous previous warnings just by getting your friends to spam the forums? :lol:
milkribs4k
Sergeant
Sergeant
 

PreviousNext

Return to General discussion