PVP Server Population

Discussion forum related to Nostalrius Begins in general.

Re: PVP Server Population

by Turgon » Sun Jan 31, 2016 2:19 pm

Does anyone know what the chinese word for overpopulated is?
User avatar
Turgon
Sergeant
Sergeant
 

Re: PVP Server Population

by Erou » Sun Jan 31, 2016 2:34 pm

Turgon wrote:Does anyone know what the chinese word for overpopulated is?
Ni hao
Erou
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: PVP Server Population

by Tinkertown » Sun Jan 31, 2016 2:36 pm

Marcusius wrote:
Tinkertown wrote:
Marcusius wrote:Hmm actually i do have 1 idea. Make a new pvp realm, and cap the current one at let's say 8k or maybe even 7k.


No. Cap.

At least not one that applies to players with level 60 characters.

If they create a new server then anyone who doesn't like the current server solution are free to leave. Bye, bye. Don't force a queue with the hell that creates for organised raiding on those who want to stay.


Meh i think they should cap it, for it would give a bigger incentive for people to go play on the 2nd pvp realm, beacuse who wants to wait in a queue of 4k ppl... They need a cap anyway, because at the time of writing this, there's 12,8 ppl online. FFS npcs don't even load properly, u see ppl come into your field of view when they're so close to you, the view distance is dreaful and every action has a 1+ second delay. Just played a WSG and it was terrible. Half the team was moaning about the delay. Grats to melee classes i guess lol, OUT OF RANGE; OUT OF RANGE; OUT OF RANGE. Ppl were bloody teleporting around on my screen xD


If it is so dreadful, you should just go to the other server if one opens up. You shouldn't need any more motivation. Why would you want to make things bad for the players who want to stay if you are leaving anyway? There would seem to be no point.
Tinkertown
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 

Re: PVP Server Population

by rewind » Sun Jan 31, 2016 3:03 pm

News flash: Server is unplayable during chinese peak hours
User avatar
rewind
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: PVP Server Population

by Casieqt » Sun Jan 31, 2016 3:14 pm

Image

just made a new pvp server for our asian invaders because they don't care about english in general.
After looking into your case, I can only say that you're a very naughty boy. - #Pottu 2016
Casieqt
Sergeant
Sergeant
 

Re: PVP Server Population

by Ana » Sun Jan 31, 2016 3:31 pm

Hey, it turns out the "English in public channels" thing is nowhere to be seen in ToU anymore.
Ana
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: PVP Server Population

by Tinkertown » Sun Jan 31, 2016 3:39 pm

Ana wrote:Hey, it turns out the "English in public channels" thing is nowhere to be seen in ToU anymore.


If it ever has been in the ToU, that was a long time ago. As in many, many month ago. That rule can be found here: FAQ
Tinkertown
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 

Re: PVP Server Population

by Levinas » Sun Jan 31, 2016 3:45 pm

Ana wrote:Hey, it turns out the "English in public channels" thing is nowhere to be seen in ToU anymore.


Even if it was, I doubt it would lead to any sanctions.

This seems to be the only response available to the Nost administration when talking about the Chinese:

Image
Greatness, at any cost.
User avatar
Levinas
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: PVP Server Population

by snawfu » Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:10 pm

HEYYY KIDs the server is unplayable from 8am server time to around 9-10pm

what do about this

remove the RICE!


help us make server good
patato
snawfu
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: PVP Server Population

by Jeddite » Sun Jan 31, 2016 5:17 pm

It is rather generous of the Nostralrius admins to have created (and financially support/maintain) a private classic-WoW server for a majority-nonEuropean playerbase.

But I guess that's just consistent with how contemporary continental Europe works nowadays. Doubly-so for Franceland.


Erou wrote:
Turgon wrote:Does anyone know what the chinese word for overpopulated is?
Ni hao



lol'ing out loud on line
User avatar
Jeddite
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 

PreviousNext

Return to General discussion