Viper appreciation thread ('tuber controversy')

[Finalflash]

--edited--

[Junkerd]

--edited--

(edited by monkeynews friend)
>inb4 second edit

Don't you have some low lvl horde to kill?

[milkribs4k]

The rules against bug abusing, and what constitutes bug abusing is just so completely plain to understand, and several times they have explicitly warned the same players, and even issued temp bans to make it even more clear.

[Halcyon702]

It's a good thing Viper accepts monetary/sexual favors.. or possesses a rational mind, else we'd be at the mercy of scrub casual players turned volunteer GM's now deign to any community action aside from their "Deal with it " attitude; that is when not actively locking or censoring conversation, or busy banning the latest exploit from some mage guy who was blinking to avoid fall damage.

[Quaxis]

I find it amazing that Felwood is such serious business, here.

But... but... PROGRESSION! Have to add that 32 min MC speed run to my CV.

[reysode]

8 str to head/leg slot is serious business

[Sharax]

Wow. I'm impressed.

I reckon it would serve Nost well to avoid the potential for such shit storms in the future, though, no? Just tweak the procedure to be sensible... like, server-wide announcement several times over a span of 2-3 days when you make a decision that X is in fact a bannable exploit, prior to banning anyone for it... seems like common sense tbh.

Common sense would be not to exploit questionable game mechanics in the first place or discuss it with a GM first.

[Darkwinjax]

Wow. I'm impressed.

I reckon it would serve Nost well to avoid the potential for such shit storms in the future, though, no? Just tweak the procedure to be sensible... like, server-wide announcement several times over a span of 2-3 days when you make a decision that X is in fact a bannable exploit, prior to banning anyone for it... seems like common sense tbh.

Common sense would be not to exploit questionable game mechanics in the first place or discuss it with a GM first.

Common sense dictates that this behaviour which goes on for 1 year since server release, is working according to blizzlike scripts, and as such, is an unavoidable thing that will happen to you eventually while gathering a felwood node, is not an exploit.

But you must be special so I take it you also ticketed the GM to ask if reseting DM:N and keeping the key is a game exploit.

Mongoloid.

[Sharax]

Wow. I'm impressed.

I reckon it would serve Nost well to avoid the potential for such shit storms in the future, though, no? Just tweak the procedure to be sensible... like, server-wide announcement several times over a span of 2-3 days when you make a decision that X is in fact a bannable exploit, prior to banning anyone for it... seems like common sense tbh.

Common sense would be not to exploit questionable game mechanics in the first place or discuss it with a GM first.

Common sense dictates that this behaviour which goes on for 1 year since server release, is working according to blizzlike scripts, and as such, is an unavoidable thing that will happen to you eventually while gathering a felwood node, is not an exploit.

But you must be special so I take it you also ticketed the GM to ask if reseting DM:N and keeping the key is a game exploit.

Mongoloid.

I find it amusing that you think a private server would have corrected every single deficiency of the original game. Why even bother having an exploit clause in the ToU? By now, everything must be working according to Blizzlike scripts since Nost has been up for a whole year.