I think he should be banned

[616619289]

I see he use the bug spot to kill other player, i think it should be banned!



i dont know how to adjust the pics's size

[stif]

much rage coming youre way soon!

[zzxx]

Dead zone is not safespoting, and LHC is not even supposed to have guards atm.

[Bazinga]

what happend to Ioná btw?
https://forum.nostalrius.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=25502

[Robotron]

Dead zone is not safespoting, and LHC is not even supposed to have guards atm.

I believe this is correct. Now, if he were on terrain that bugged the guards or something, that'd be bannable.

[goody0210]

Dead zone is not safespoting, and LHC is not even supposed to have guards atm.

I believe this is correct. Now, if he were on terrain that bugged the guards or something, that'd be bannable.

It's funny that you mention this, because I was banned for so called "dead zoning". How is it my fault that I am purposefully and strategically standing enough yards away from a lvl 60 mob that will aggro me if I stand too close to it and attack other players. It is part of the game and this should not be a bannable offense, but Nostalrius seems to think differently. If they have a problem with this kind of thing, then maybe they should add a code that would increase the aggro radius to these kinds of places, like Booty Bay, Gadgetzan, RATCHET( which has no guards in the main little area as soon as you walk off the pier), Everlook, and Light's Hope.

[Tinkertown]

It would indeed seem prudent to increase the aggro range of guards slightly to avoid this issue. However, if the range is determined only by level and not a value in a database it obviously isn't going to be an easy fix and almost certainly not a high priority.

Dead zone is not safespoting, and LHC is not even supposed to have guards atm.

Well, I agree. But once they are there the fact that if you defend yourself they attack you is really retarded. Not having the guards there at all would be better for the people getting attacked. Very counter intuitive.